<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New HTML Spec: v5 ?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gizmosforgeeks.com/2007/07/20/new-html-spec-v5/2336/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gizmosforgeeks.com/2007/07/20/new-html-spec-v5/2336</link>
	<description>Whoever Has The Most Toys Wins!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 08:00:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: KJH World &#187; Do we really need a new HTML spec? What&#8217;s wrong with XHTML?</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmosforgeeks.com/2007/07/20/new-html-spec-v5/2336/comment-page-1#comment-73</link>
		<dc:creator>KJH World &#187; Do we really need a new HTML spec? What&#8217;s wrong with XHTML?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 05:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmosforgeeks.com/2007/07/20/new-html-spec-v5/#comment-73</guid>
		<description>[...] 5 is on the horizon and may be showing up in a browser near you in a few years. I wrote up a piece on this over at GfG. I can&#8217;t say I&#8217;m looking forward to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 5 is on the horizon and may be showing up in a browser near you in a few years. I wrote up a piece on this over at GfG. I can&#8217;t say I&#8217;m looking forward to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
